By ANDREW JEFFERY

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

After nearly 3 years of bleeding cash, US homebuilders are on shaky ground.

The market for new homes is being decimated by rampant overbuilding during the boom, and by the flood of bank-owned properties now being sold on the cheap. Prices remain in free fall. Even as labor expenses and materials costs hover around recent lows, the business of building new homes is still broken.

But after 2 “positive” datapoints last week, and KB Home’s (KBH) narrower-than-expected loss, many are wondering if the worst is now behind the beleaguered industry. Government-backed efforts to keep mortgage rates low and encourage home buying could save the builders. Maybe.

New home construction, for all its complications and intricacies, is a rather simple business: Sell homes for more than it costs to build them.

New homes have traditionally carried a premium to “used” ones; the median sale price of a new home is currently about 20% higher than that of one that’s been previously owned. Builders relied on this premium to cover their construction and financing costs, not to mention to generate a healthy profit. But now that buyers can buy barely used houses at fire-sale prices, the allure of the brand-new is on the wane.

Here in the San Francisco Bay Area, banks are said to literally be giving land away for free: Builders will have nothing to do with it. The costs associated with owning improved lots (in other words, lots ready for the construction of a house) are too high for – even if they’re offered for free. Building just isn’t an economically viable option - and it won’t be until housing prices rebound.

And that could take years.

Meanwhile, homebuilders like KB Home and rivals Centex (CTX), Lennar (LEN) and DR Horton (DHI) are struggling to rid themselves of unsold homes. Builders large and small are slashing prices, trimming staff, hawking vacant land for pennies on the dollar, and doing anything else they can think of to stay alive.

Many face an additional headwind this year: Tax rebates from previous operating losses will be drying up. Debt remains high, and cash is barely trickling in.

Ultimately, some big builders won’t make it. The market, both for equities and default protection in the form of credit default swaps, is betting on Hovnanian (HOV), Beazer Home (BZH) and Standard Pacific (SPF) to be the first of the big dogs to fail.

Those hoping to survive are rapidly adjusting their strategies to adapt to the changing demands of the American homebuyer. As Minyanville’s Terry Woo noted on Friday, KB Home’s better-than-expected earings were partly a reflection of a switch to smaller, cheaper homes.

This is a positive trend: it’s yet another indicator that Americans have a newfound love affair with thrift. And while we may lose a few builders along the way, I doubt we’ll miss all those identical, pre-fabricated houses that had come to litter our landscape.

By ANDREW JEFFERY

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

Our elected officials appear convinced that Americans should buy stuff they don’t need with money they don’t have.

The Senate, in passing its version of the over $800 billion economic stimulus package yesterday, threw a great deal of cash at 2 industries whose products we have far too much of already. Despite the fact that we have too many cars on the road and far more homes than we do people to buy them, lawmakers are determined to prop up both the auto-making and home-building industries.

According to Bloomberg, Ford (F), General Motors (GM) and Chrysler, the latter 2 already suckling the government teat just to stay alive, will benefit from a provision that allows consumers to deduct car-loan interest payments and local sales taxes from their income tax.

Meanwhile, Centex (CTX), DR Horton (DHI) and other homebuilders are salivating at the prospect of a $15,000 tax credit for those brave enough to buy a new home. The new, more generous tax break replaces a $7,500 credit granted last year.

In what shouldn’t come as a surprise, Brian Catalde, the president of the National Association of Homebuilders (or NAHB) is pleased that his group’s intense lobbying efforts paid off.

“We’re pretty happy with the way the Senate bill is shaping up,” Catalde said. “We think it will entice a lot of those people sitting on the sidelines into the marketplace.

”NAHB members nervously await the disposition of the final bill as their balance sheets remain bloated with unsold homes priced well above prevailing market prices.

Lawmakers seem determined to dig our way out our debt problem with yet more debt. By encouraging Americans to borrow more to buy the cars and homes irresponsibly manufactured by these industries in the first place, Congress and the President alike reward the very poor financial decisions that brought our economy to its knees in the first place.

To borrow the analogy from Professor Succo’s piece yesterday, Economy: Code Blue, this is akin to handing an obese person a donut, telling them to munch away as long as they stay away from pizza. It just doesn’t make any sense.

Among the Senate bill’s numerous differences from the House’s version passed last week — most notably the handouts earmarked for homebuilders and automakers — it also excises more than $20 billion in funding for new public-school construction.

Once again, lawmakers display their unparalleled financial acumen: Only more McMansions will counteract the vast oversupply of schools this country is struggling to get out from under.

By ANDREW JEFFERY

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

Foreclosure: It’s not just for those “subprime” people anymore.

Besieged by collapsing home prices and frightened banks scrounging for cash, even the real-estate industry’s brightest stars are finding there’s no place to hide. According to the New York Times, small and mid-size homebuilders who thrived during the housing boom are seeing credit lines pulled even before they miss a payment.

Banks like JPMorgan (JPM) and GMAC, the financing arm of General Motors (GM), loaned builders hundreds of billions of dollars — even as the housing market began to falter — to buy up vacant land. Now that demand for new homes has plunged (and buyers in some areas can pick up previously constructed homes for less than it costs to build a new one), builders’ ability to turn a profit has been effectively eliminated.

It’s estimated that over 20% of the nation’s homebuilders have closed their doors, even as big builders like D.R. Horton (DHI), Lennar (LEN) and Toll Brothers (TOL) limp along, bleeding cash and fighting for survival.

Lenders, for their part, are scrambling to mitigate risk.

Collateral, the term used to describe the assets against which loans are given out, protects lenders in the event of borrower default. As the value of collateral rises, banks become better protected since their loans are now backed up by a more valuable asset. In a downturn, however, falling collateral values means risk increases with each passing day.

In response, banks may ask borrowers to send in cash to make up for the lost value of their investment. These margin calls, as they’re known, can quickly force small firms into insolvency.

Such was the case for Brown Family Communities, a well-known builder in the Phoenix area. The Times reports the firm’s lender, JPMorgan, demanded millions in cash for land on the outskirts of town that had fallen in value. Brown balked, since he was yet to miss a payment and had been a longstanding client of the bank with an impeccable record. Ultimately, Brown lost the property and closed his doors, complaining “The real estate market is gone.”

Other builders have suffered a similar fate, proving that despite extensive government-led efforts to minimize losses from investments gone awry, the fundamental tenets of capitalism remain intact.

Bad investments should yield losses, period. Savvy new buyers, able to handle the risk inherent in buying distressed properties, can make bets that have the potential to reap huge rewards. This cycle of profits and losses fuels economic expansion. By forestalling losses, intervention delays recovery.

The speculative buying of vacant desert land on the edges of the Phoenix city limits in 2005 and 2006 certainly qualifies as a poor use of borrowed money. That builders are being asked for cash to cover banks’ potential losses should be seen as nothing more than prudent lending – something builders and other real-estate investors spent the boom years conveniently forgetting.

By ANDREW JEFFERY

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

Is it a buyer’s market?

Ask most real-estate professionals the above question, and the response will almost certainly be an emphatic “Yes!”

After all, they quickly explain, inventory levels are at all-time highs, sellers are desperate to get out from under their rapidly depreciating homes, and mortgage rates are at historic lows. What more could buyers ask for?

How about not losing their shirts, for starters.

The traditional definition of a buyer’s market is one where supply outstrips demand, pushing down prices: Buyers have the upper hand. As the bull market begins to wane, however, buyers lose their enthusiasm and become concerned about price. The market cools down and buyers shy away, forcing sellers to make concessions and lower prices. This, in turn, creates an environment where buyers can shop around, be picky, and patiently waiting for their dream house to come on the market.

As demand returns, sellers start upping their list prices, refusing to pay for closing costs and holding out for a better offer. Buyers, fearful they might miss out on the next boom, bid up asking prices and ask for fewer concessions. Now that sellers have the upper hand, the market favors sellers as prices move upward. Such is the cyclical nature of real estate.

This story has played out for decades as real estate plodded along, homebuilders like DR Horton (DHI), KB Homes (KBH) and Toll Brothers (TOL) supplied the market with new construction and home prices marched steadily upward, outpacing inflation by the narrowest of margins. A little more than 10 years ago, however, that relationship started to come unglued.

The recent housing bubble turned the prevailing view of real estate on its head. Homes, long viewed as the most stable of all assets, became a speculative tool for even the most unsophisticated investor. The mania, fueled by lax monetary policy and Wall Street alchemy, helped contributed to the financial crisis currently gripping our country. As property values have careened back to earth, real estate assets of all kinds have become toxic.

Nevertheless, the National Association of Realtors (or NAR) and its dedicated minions have tirelessly peddled their lies that ours is a buyer’s market. Let’s take a quick jaunt back in time to some recent headlines and where that traditional assessment of a buyer’s market got us:

Las Vegas: It’s Definitely a Buyer’s Market
USA Today: July 5, 2006
“Real estate looks like one of the biggest gambles in Las Vegas.”

How true. Property values in Vegas have fallen 33% since summer 2006. Not to be outdone by their peers at USA Today, ABC ran this piece just weeks later:

Take Advantage of Real Estate’s Buyer’s Market
ABC News: July 31, 2006

“The National Association of Realtors said that the number of homes for sale has reached new heights, which is good news for buyers. After years of a seller’s market, it’s finally a buyer’s paradise in Phoenix, AZ.”

Anyone who bought in that “buyer’s paradise” in Phoenix has seen their home’s value fall by more than 30%.

The point isn’t to criticize realtors for arguing it’s a buyer’s market: After all, one should expect nothing less from a group whose entire existence is based on convincing buyers it’s a great time to buy – irrespective of the truth. Just ask Gary Keller, whose new book, Shift: How Top Real Estate Agents Tackle Tough Times, advises agents to “find every way possible to overcome the media-driven real-estate malaise.”

The traditional definition of a buyer’s market needs a bit of a makeover. A more sensible definition is a market where buyers have ample opportunity to make good investments. To be sure, a home is more than just an investment; it’s a place to raise one’s family, to grow old, to spend time with loved ones. However, as far too many American families have learned in the past three years, homes can become a debilitating burden if bought at the wrong price.

In today’s market, there certainly exist attractive investment opportunities. But to label the market as a whole as one where buyers should be rushing out in search of the American Dream is borderline lunacy. Throughout much of the country, home prices are still too high: Real incomes don’t support prevailing property values, even after the historic declines we’ve already seen. Supply, despite remaining at record levels, is likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. Home prices are undergoing a much-needed correction, and will continue to do so until fundamental demand catches up with supply.

This isn’t to say every home on the market is overpriced, or that every buyer in the past 36 months has gotten a raw deal. There are deals to be had if one knows where and how to look – and, most importantly if the purchase makes good financial sense. To borrow a theme from Toddo, “financial staying power” should be at the forefront of any prospective buyer’s mind.

So ignore the hype, both good and bad. As often is the case, not until the most ardent bulls turn in their horns will the bears return to hibernation. So, as soon as realtors concede it may not be a buyer’s market after all, voila! A bottom we will have.

By ANDREW JEFFERY

For as bad as things are in the housing market, it’s remarkable that none of the country’s big homebuilders have gone bust. The industry’s resilience is a testament to how much money the firms raked in during the boom.

Just ask guys in charge.

The Wall Street Journal reports many homebuilder CEOs socked away such obscene amounts of cash over the past 5 years that they out-earned their Wall Street counterparts. As profits soared, Toll Brothers (TOL) CEO Robert Toll and his brother Bruce together took home $773 million, while Dwight Schar, chairman of Virginia-based NVR (NVR) earned more than $625 million from stock sales.

By contrast, vilified Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo earned a mere $471 million during the same period.

Sitting on huge — but dwindling — stockpiles of cash, big builders like DR Horton (DHI), Lennar (LEN) and Ryland Homes (RYL) have thus far ridden out the bloodletting. According to JPMorgan analyst Michael Rehaut, these 3 may yet see positive cash flow in 2009.

Their smaller rivals, however, may not be so lucky.

Rehaut predicts that Pulte Home (PHM) and KB Home (KBH) could see negative cash flow next year – and some analysts believe 2009 could finally be the year that weaker hands start to fold. Credit protection for Hovnanian (HOV), Standard Pacific (SPF) and Beazer Home (BZH) is trading like the companies’ failure is a foregone conclusion.

Meanwhile, one key characteristic of market bottoms is notably absent: Consolidation.

Just as strong American banks have swallowed up the weak, no meaningful housing market bottom will be found until homebuilders begin to feast on one another.

Let’s face it: We don’t need 10 different multi-billion dollar companies churning out indistinguishable cookie-cutter ”mansions” on tiny lots in cramped subdivisions miles from the nearest grocery store. We’ve got our hands full already, thank you very much.

Yesterday, the Commerce Department said October housing starts registered the lowest reading since 1959. Since just 4 of the 10 builders mentioned in this article existed 50 years ago, it looks like 6 are pretty much dispensable.

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

That glitzy McMansion you’ve always wanted may finally be within reach.

Or not.

If nearly 3 years of home price declines, historically low interest rates and a relentless media barrage of half-truths from the National Association of Realtors haven’t been able to stabilize home prices, it’s doubtful a gimmicky used-car-style sales event will do the trick.

Coldwell Banker, one of the nation’s largest real-estate brokerages, launched a nationwide campaign last Friday to boost the flagging housing market. The 10-day sales event aims to close the gap between buyers and sellers by offering up to a 10% discount on listed homes for, you guessed it, 10 days.

This selling bonanza was hatched in response to a recent survey of over 3000 of the firm’s real estate agents, which found that a majority feel listing prices are too high to attract buyers. The survey also showed almost 80% of the agents believe more appropriately priced homes are garnering more attention; apparently, you need a license to know people like to pay less for a house, not more.

Coldwell Banker’s president and CEO, Jim Gillespie, is confident the housing market may finally be nearing a bottom. He told our friends at Marketwatch: “Despite the difficult headlines regarding our overall economy, the residential real estate market has been showing several positive signs over recent months that could be signaling a tipping point.”

It’s unclear whether continuing price declines, historically high levels of inventory, tightening lending requirements or frozen credit markets are the “positive signs” he’s referring to.

Gillespie also believes the unprecedented sales event will encourage buyers to jump back into the market: “Because of higher inventory, buyers have more homes to choose from and they can take advantage of near historically low interest rates and affordability levels that are the best they have been in years.”

Yes, affordability levels are the best they have been in years: Much better than when the only way to get into a house was to lie about your income and take out an Option ARM with a 1% teaser rate.

About this time last year, homebuilder Hovnanian (HOV) tried a nationwide fire sale to flush out its bloated inventory. More recently, Lennar (LEN), Centex (CTX), and DR Horton (DHI) tried a similar approach with both land and homes – to no avail. The fundamental forces pushing housing prices down will persist, regardless of futile ploys aimed at tricking buyers into paying more than they should for homes.

To be clear: Being negative on the housing market isn’t exactly a contrarian position. Therefore, anyone claiming it’s a great time to buy – like Coldwell Banker and tens of thousands of real estate professionals around the country — clearly have their own reasons for doing so.

Real estate agents get paid to close transactions; whether their client receives (or pays) a fair price is a non-issue.

Commission expenses are borne by sellers, typically to the tune of 6% of the sale price. In California, where the median home price is still over $350,000, that’s $20,000 out of the pocket of someone who’s already seen his home’s value evaporate before his eyes.

The selling agent usually splits the commission with the buyer’s agent, a pay structure that gives both sides an incentive to not only focus exclusively on closing deals, but also to sell homes for as much as possible.

Coldwell Banker correctly asserts that many sellers have unrealistic expectations about their homes’ final selling price, and as a result keep asking for prices too high for too long. Their cute little sales event, however, is aimed more at earning commissions for their struggling agents than advancing true price discovery in the troubled housing market. If the firm truly had the best interests of homeowners in mind, agents would volunteer to take a pay cut to ease their troubled clients’ burden.

Gillespie, Coldwell’s CEO, claims the event will “help move the US real estate market in the right direction.” He’s right – home prices must continue to fall. Simple economics, the interplay between supply and demand, is driving most markets, as tens of homes sit on the market for every one qualified buyer. Until this overhead supply is worked through, prices will remain under pressure.

In some of the most depressed areas – Las Vegas, the California Central Valley, Florida and Phoenix – homes have reached or surpassed traditional levels of affordability. Unfortunately, there’s more to buying a home than just being able to make the monthly payments. With down payment requirements returning to pre-bubble levels, low interest rates are almost a moot point.

There just isn’t any economic rationale for buying if home values keep sliding.

Even if a borrower can afford the monthly payments, home price declines wipe out the tax benefits of writing off mortgage payments and risk putting the new homeowner in the paralyzing position of owing more than his home is worth. Buying a home today is almost like buying a new car: You’re upside-down as soon as you’re handed the keys.

Until there’s real, verifiable evidence that home prices have stabilized, buying a home remains a dangerous financial proposition. This is true in every market, not just the ones that make the headlines for mind-boggling foreclosure rates.

Renting is still the far more fiscally responsible option. Staring into the teeth of a recession, families should be making choices in the best interest of their financial security, not for bragging rights at cocktail parties.