By AUSTIN NELSON

In today’s fast paced, data-driven world, it’s easy to get lost in the morass of statistics flashing across our TVs and computer screens at a sometimes maddening pace.

Government officials, bankers, retailers and snake oil salesmen alike throw out statistical arguments at the drop of a hat, telling you why their pitch is the only one worth listening to because they have the data to back it up. But before accepting what you hear or read at face value just because some nameless research institute did a study, stop for a minute to ponder the complexities of even the most seemingly innocuous of statistics: The average.

Let’s first assume some particular data being quoted were reliably gathered and analyzed (This is almost never a safe assumption, but that’s a topic for another day), then examine how the average and another so-called “descriptive statistic” –- the median — are used in the data reports we see every day.

While on the surface it may seem that these two statistical measures could be interchangeable (indeed they are often used interchangeably with no explanation), they tell us very different things about the data they describe.

The median of a given group of data is its middle value. For instance, if your dataset has five data points and you lined them all up from smallest to largest, the third value would be your median. On the other hand, the average, or mean, of a dataset is determined by summing all values and dividing by the number of data points.

For example, suppose you are looking at real estate sales in a certain area within a certain time frame and you had the following 5 values: $300,000, $320,000, $320,000, $450,000, and $1,200,000. The median of this set is $320,000 (the middle value). The average is $518,000 (2,590,000 / 5). As you can see, even in this simple example, the two descriptive statistics are significantly different.

Real estate sales are often represented by the median value. The reasons for this are varied, but center around the fact that a few sales at extremely high levels (like that $2 million house on the top of the hill) can easily skew the average of a dataset towards those properties, even though most homes in the area are selling at lower prices.

For example, in Temecula, CA where most homes sell at modest levels (by California standards) but some homes sell for significantly more, the average sale price in 2008 was about $435,000. The median price, on the other hand, was around $359,000. That’s is a difference of over 20%.

Contrast that with areas where home prices are more homogenous, like Daly City, CA, where the average and median values are more closely in line. In 2008, the average sale price for Daly City was around $562,000 while the median was about $558,000 – a much smaller spread (<1%).

So which is better? Average or median? As can be seen from the examples above, neither.

Both display different aspects of the same set of data points. In Temecula, where median and average wildly diverge, using the average skews the data towards a much higher level. An individual from out of state looking to buy there might incorrectly assume they couldn’t afford to do so. On the other hand, solely looking at the median leaves out the fact that there are million dollar plus estates in Temecula available to buyers looking for that sort of thing.

When the National Association of Realtors releases their monthly sales statistics — which is the real estate pricing data carried by most major news outlets — they present sales price data as both median and average values. These values are used to track sales prices over time to identify trends in sales activity nationwide and regionally. While both median and average values are freely available to anyone with internet access, the median values are often the ones quoted in the popular press.

By focusing exclusively on median values, however, one can miss interesting trends.

For example, on a nationwide level and in three of the four regions identified, median and average home sale prices have been tracking at around the same relative spread since 2005. In the West region, however, the median sales price has been falling faster than the average price.

This widening variance helps tell the story of what’s been happening in Western real estate markets in the past few years. In most markets, high-priced homes have retained their value better than homes that are closer to, or below the median. Since so many lower end homes are being sold, many after foreclosure, the sheer volume of these transactions is dragging down the median figures. The average, on the other hand, is propped up by the few expensive homes still being sold.

This analysis then begs the question, why does the trend only exist in the West? As other regions decline, can we expect the same pattern to play out? Why are higher priced homes holding up better? If expensive homes begin to lose their value, what would that do to the median and average sales prices? What does the data look like on a city or zip code level?

It’s easy to see that just by comparing the median and average sales price trends, much insight — or at the very least another list of questions — can be gained.

I could go on all day about the wealth of information that such a seemingly simple statistic as the average can provide those with the patience and curiosity to “drill down” past the headlines. But my point is simply this: Pay attention! Don’t let the evening news or your favorite web news source gloss over the statistics to prove whatever skewed point they want to make that day. Spend the time to think critically about the information or you run the risk being fleeced regularly for the rest of your life.

At the very least, pay close attention to the source of any information you are receiving, particularly when that information comes in the form of a statistic. If you are being presented with a descriptive statistic like an average or a median, notice which one you are being given and pause for a second to think about why they used one and not the other.

Furthermore, if you notice that a single set of data is being described interchangeably by median and average, this should throw up a huge red flag as to the reliability of the information and its source.

By ANDREW JEFFERY

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

Is it a buyer’s market?

Ask most real-estate professionals the above question, and the response will almost certainly be an emphatic “Yes!”

After all, they quickly explain, inventory levels are at all-time highs, sellers are desperate to get out from under their rapidly depreciating homes, and mortgage rates are at historic lows. What more could buyers ask for?

How about not losing their shirts, for starters.

The traditional definition of a buyer’s market is one where supply outstrips demand, pushing down prices: Buyers have the upper hand. As the bull market begins to wane, however, buyers lose their enthusiasm and become concerned about price. The market cools down and buyers shy away, forcing sellers to make concessions and lower prices. This, in turn, creates an environment where buyers can shop around, be picky, and patiently waiting for their dream house to come on the market.

As demand returns, sellers start upping their list prices, refusing to pay for closing costs and holding out for a better offer. Buyers, fearful they might miss out on the next boom, bid up asking prices and ask for fewer concessions. Now that sellers have the upper hand, the market favors sellers as prices move upward. Such is the cyclical nature of real estate.

This story has played out for decades as real estate plodded along, homebuilders like DR Horton (DHI), KB Homes (KBH) and Toll Brothers (TOL) supplied the market with new construction and home prices marched steadily upward, outpacing inflation by the narrowest of margins. A little more than 10 years ago, however, that relationship started to come unglued.

The recent housing bubble turned the prevailing view of real estate on its head. Homes, long viewed as the most stable of all assets, became a speculative tool for even the most unsophisticated investor. The mania, fueled by lax monetary policy and Wall Street alchemy, helped contributed to the financial crisis currently gripping our country. As property values have careened back to earth, real estate assets of all kinds have become toxic.

Nevertheless, the National Association of Realtors (or NAR) and its dedicated minions have tirelessly peddled their lies that ours is a buyer’s market. Let’s take a quick jaunt back in time to some recent headlines and where that traditional assessment of a buyer’s market got us:

Las Vegas: It’s Definitely a Buyer’s Market
USA Today: July 5, 2006
“Real estate looks like one of the biggest gambles in Las Vegas.”

How true. Property values in Vegas have fallen 33% since summer 2006. Not to be outdone by their peers at USA Today, ABC ran this piece just weeks later:

Take Advantage of Real Estate’s Buyer’s Market
ABC News: July 31, 2006

“The National Association of Realtors said that the number of homes for sale has reached new heights, which is good news for buyers. After years of a seller’s market, it’s finally a buyer’s paradise in Phoenix, AZ.”

Anyone who bought in that “buyer’s paradise” in Phoenix has seen their home’s value fall by more than 30%.

The point isn’t to criticize realtors for arguing it’s a buyer’s market: After all, one should expect nothing less from a group whose entire existence is based on convincing buyers it’s a great time to buy – irrespective of the truth. Just ask Gary Keller, whose new book, Shift: How Top Real Estate Agents Tackle Tough Times, advises agents to “find every way possible to overcome the media-driven real-estate malaise.”

The traditional definition of a buyer’s market needs a bit of a makeover. A more sensible definition is a market where buyers have ample opportunity to make good investments. To be sure, a home is more than just an investment; it’s a place to raise one’s family, to grow old, to spend time with loved ones. However, as far too many American families have learned in the past three years, homes can become a debilitating burden if bought at the wrong price.

In today’s market, there certainly exist attractive investment opportunities. But to label the market as a whole as one where buyers should be rushing out in search of the American Dream is borderline lunacy. Throughout much of the country, home prices are still too high: Real incomes don’t support prevailing property values, even after the historic declines we’ve already seen. Supply, despite remaining at record levels, is likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. Home prices are undergoing a much-needed correction, and will continue to do so until fundamental demand catches up with supply.

This isn’t to say every home on the market is overpriced, or that every buyer in the past 36 months has gotten a raw deal. There are deals to be had if one knows where and how to look – and, most importantly if the purchase makes good financial sense. To borrow a theme from Toddo, “financial staying power” should be at the forefront of any prospective buyer’s mind.

So ignore the hype, both good and bad. As often is the case, not until the most ardent bulls turn in their horns will the bears return to hibernation. So, as soon as realtors concede it may not be a buyer’s market after all, voila! A bottom we will have.

By RYAN TAYLOR

What exactly does an appraisal mean?

Perception doesn’t always equal reality. The perception is that an appraisal represents the most accurate value of a property. The reality is that it’s a value provided by a licensed professional, given the purpose and functional use of a property on a given day. The key in that statement is “on a given day.”

While appraisals are indeed very thorough evaluations of a property, they’re not always the most accurate valuation, since they often don’t take into account all the inputs required to derive the current and future value of a home.

An appraiser uses three separate approaches to derive a property’s value:

(1) Sales Approach
(2) Cost Approach
(3) Income Approach

The Sales Approach is similar to comparative market analysis, or CMA, performed by a real estate broker. The appraiser examines comparable (ie, similar) sales and listings from the last 6 months in order to come to a value conclusion. Typically, sales are weighted more than listings, since sales are actual transactions and represent a home’s true resale price, while a listing is simply what a seller hopes to get.

Comparables must conform not only with respect to the subject property itself, but also in neighborhood characteristics. 3 bedroom, 2 bath, 2500 square foot homes on opposite sides of town often sell for very different amounts. Comparables should be within 1-mile of the subject property, but this rule is far from set in stone, as certain neighborhoods dictate a narrower — or wider — radius of comparison.

In the Cost Approach, the appraiser examines the dimensions of the property and structure to determine how much it would cost to duplicate the same home on an identical lot. This is often referred to as “replacement cost.” While this is a useful method for certain types of properties, it’s rarely the most accurate for residential real estate — especially in a volatile market such as we’re currently experiencing.

In the Income Approach, the appraiser determines how much income can be generated from the property and a value is derived from this number. The appraiser usually projects into the future and assumes some ongoing stream of income, discounting the value of that cash flow for the time value of money.

The concept of the time value of money assumes (basically), that most investors would rather receive a lump sum payment now than many smaller payments over time, since inflation causes money to be worth less in the future. Of course, all bets are off during deflation, but that’s another topic for another day.

More often than not, the value of a single family residence is reached through the use of the sales comparison approach.

In reality, the sales comparison approach is effective in providing a well researched value, but it fails to utilize all necessary inputs. While comparable sales are very important to the value of a home, the comparable listings can be — and sometimes are — more important.

We like to view comparable listings as an upper bound for a property’s value, especially in a declining market. For example, if all comparable sales sold 3 months ago for $500,000 and there is a comparable listing is now on the market for $450,000, the listing is far more important than the sales. To ignore the listing and rely on the sales would be inaccurate.

Equally important is the concept of affordability, which is rarely used by appraisers. If there have been very few comparable sales in the past three months, affordability will be increasingly important when trying to understand how much buyers can afford. Weak demand indicates few willing and able buyers in the market, so evaluating prevailing income levels in a particular area help determine whether values are set for small declines, steep declines, or may be approaching stabilization.

Finally, mortgage and credit market conditions — especially now — are very important to the value of a home. In today’s lending world, you need a down payment, good credit and a strong employment history to get a loan. There are plenty of areas where the qualified buyer pool is very shallow. Appraisers don’t put a lot of weight into this fact. 3 sales in the last 6 months means a very different thing if last year there were 30 during the same time period, or just a handful.

While the sales approach does have value, it could be more comprehensive.

A crucial point to understanding appraisals is that the value is today’s value, saying nothing for tomorrow. The reality is that this is an appraisers job; they are not forecasters.

In the current market place, the appraisal can, and some would argue should, be considered irrelevant 30 days after the completion date. When markets can drop upwards of 5-10% in a single month, an appraisal that’s a month old isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on.

However, since the appraisal is still considered by the housing industry to be the most accurate representation of a home’s value, always look at the completion date to determine what lenders and investors believe a home to be worth on a given day. Whether you like it or not, this is the value on that day.

Is the process of reaching an appraised value the most defined valuation process in today’s marketplace?
Definitely.

Is an appraisal the most accurate process to determine the true value of a single family residence? Maybe.

Is an appraisal a projection of what the value of the property will be in the future? Absolutely not.

Click here for the results of this House of the Day.

Today’s property is located in Stanton, CA a suburban neighborhood smack in the middle of Orange County.

(Click to enlarge image)

Home Details:
- 8511 Chanticleer Rd, Stanton, CA 90680
- 3 Bedrooms
- 1 Bathrooms
- 1347 square feet living area
- 0.17 acres
- Built in 1956
- “Recent” sale 2/27/1987 for $120,000

Property is not currently listed, no description available.

–

From time to time, Cirios Real Estate posts a home listed in California as its “House of the Day.” We then post a valuation assessment completed by our team of property value experts. We encourage our readers to post comments and participate in a discussion about the home’s value.

Cirios Real Estate has no buying or selling interest in any of the homes we evaluate, they are posted here for the benefit of our community. This analysis is a broker’s opinion of value and is not to be construed as an appraisal.