This post first appeared on Minyanville.

It appears even the embattled homebuilding industry is getting rosy-eyed, finding enough “green shoots” of economic recovery to stick their shovels back into the ground.

In May, US builders broke ground on 17.2% more projects than in April, far exceeding analysts’ expectations. Work on new apartment buildings leaped, while single-family starts continued what’s now become a 3-month rally.

Although the aggregate figure is still well off last year’s rate, economists are breathing a sigh of relief that the worst of the housing market swoon could be behind us. Skeptics, however, are quick to point out that any recovery could be muted, as high levels of inventory, a weak labor market, and mortgage rates that just won’t seem to stay down, could forestall any recovery.

As Kenneth Simonson, chief economist for the Associated General Contractors of America, told the New York Times, “There’s a real possibility [housing starts] will just stall at a low level. If the recent jump in interest rates is sustained, that could choke off buyer enthusiasm for new homes.”

For nearly 4 years, the business of building and selling homes has been, in a word, lousy. As home prices tumbled, the likes of KB Home (KBH), Toll Brothers (TOL) and Lennar (LEN) slashed prices, offered generous incentives, and otherwise bent over backwards to unload inventory. Building all but stalled, jacking up unemployment — particularly in exurbs and sprawling communities whose economies were largely based on the construction trade. An industry that grew fat during the boom was forced to slim down, lay off workers, and hibernate, while the market’s violent correction ran its course.

And although a host of small builders have closed up shop, to date, no major US homebuilder has gone under. Consolidation, too, has been scant. The only merger of note was Pulte Home’s (PHM) purchase of Centex (CTX), a marriage that, once consummated, will create the country’s largest builder.

The outlook for those builders that remain — builders that are bleeding cash while pleading with creditors to extend loan terms and waive busted covenants — is bleak. Last week, the National Association of Homebuilders/Wells Fargo Builder Sentiment Survey ticked down after rising far more than expected the month before. Higher interest rates are mostly to blame, as the specter of bigger monthly payments is quelling optimism that the housing market is on the mend.

The reality — an unfortunate one for builders and their employees — is that for the foreseeable future, their services aren’t needed in this country; we have too many homes as it is. Demand for new ones remains weak as communities just a decade old slip into disrepair, and shoddy craftsmanship and half-finished developments scare off prospective buyers.

Builders are also fouling up the nascent housing “recovery” by turning recently completed condominium units into rentals. Even as demand wanes thanks to job losses and tighter budgets, rental inventory is rising. Rents, as a result, are falling. This is great news for tenants, eager to jump on affordable apartments, but bad news for landlords and even homeowners.

One of the most popular arguments posited by housing-market-bottom callers is that in some of the hardest hit areas, prices have gotten so low that investors can scoop up cheap homes and rent them for an attractive return. What they neglect to mention, however, is that this sort of market-clearing activity also increases the supply of rental units, further pressuring home prices. Even in the worst, most washed-out areas, a bottom remains elusive.

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

Finally, housing is starting to act like a market searching for a bottom.

Well, sort of.

In former boom states like California, Arizona and Florida, distressed sales are driving the local real-estate markets. After a near-complete evaporation of buying activity last year, buyers have been brought off the sidelines by continued price declines, a glut of homes for sale, and low interest rates. Comparisons with last year are easy: Some areas are seeing activity up more than 300% year-over-year.

Many contend this is a healthy development, as prices return to more affordable levels and latent demand sops up overhanging supply. The bottom, they argue, is nigh.

However, even in areas seeing strong buying activity, median home prices continue to tumble. Banks and private sellers alike are finding the only way to guarantee a sale is to list the house below the market. This constant undercutting is pushing prices down, sometimes well below affordability levels derived from median income data.

This trend is not indicative of the capitulation most market watchers believe must happen before prices can truly bottom.

Capitulation is a concept more often reserved for equity-market analysis than for housing. Since real estate is vastly more fragmented and localized than stocks, housing trends take months, even years to develop, while equities can reverse course in a manner of days, if not hours.

Still, drilling down into individual transactions, evidence of capitulation in certain markets is becoming evident. Sellers, after 4 years of price declines, are finally throwing in the towel.

Homebuilders are becoming desperate: Toll Brothers (TOL) is trying to lure in buyers with 3.99% interest rates through a partnership with Wells Fargo (WFC). Centex (CTX) did them one better by offering rates as low as 3.25% (that rise to 4.50% after 2 years) and Pulte Homes (PHM) also offers a 3.99% fixed rate option for qualified buyers.

Banks like JPMorgan (JPM), Bank of America (BAC) and Citigroup (C), desperate to shed their growing inventory of foreclosed homes, are beginning to accept bids 10, 15 or even 20% below their asking prices.

And its not just banks. Just in the past few weeks, private sellers have started to jump at low-ball offers. Better to take less cash now than be constantly priced out of the market, chasing it all the way down.

Although this type of sale is still very much the exception rather than the rule, it’s an indication that sellers are becoming despondent, willing to accept any reasonable price to rid themselves of what could be months of headaches, upkeep expenses and deteriorating market conditions.

To be clear: This analysis is by no means a call that housing has bottomed, or is even remotely close to a bottom. It’s merely evidence that certain areas are closer to stabilization that others, and these signs — which may look like capitulation — should be viewed as a positive development in a market deeply in need of hope.

By ANDREW JEFFERY

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

Increasingly, US real estate is becoming a tale of 2 markets.

In low-income neighborhoods, overbuilt suburbs, and other areas besieged by foreclosures, home sales are through the roof.

Data released this week by MDA Dataquick, a real estate information service, show December 2008 sales in Southern California’s hard-hit Riverside and San Bernardino counties up a whopping 300% from a year ago. Southern California as a whole has seen transactions spike more than 50%, while pockets of the San Francisco Bay Area are showing similarly robust numbers.

Prices, however, continue to plunge.

Foreclosure sales are driving distressed markets, and since repossessions disproportionately affect lower-priced homes, data are being skewed downward. Record-low interest rates, bottom-fishing investors and relentless marketing efforts by the National Association of Realtors are all spurring renewed buying activity.

Lenders are so overrun with new business that Wells Fargo (WFC), which plans to cut over 10,000 jobs as it absorbs recently purchased Wachovia, is hiring hundreds of temporary workers to handle mortgage applications, according to MortgageDaily.com.

Meanwhile, buyers are on strike in high-end markets, and supply is creeping towards materially unhealthy levels.

Jumbo loans – those not guaranteed by the government via Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) – are nigh impossible to get, leaving would-be buyers of expensive homes in the lurch. Transactions are down in some of California’s — and indeed the country’s –  most prestigious markets, leaving a host of recently minted real estate millionaires wondering if they’re next to get stuck in the subprime slime.

Conventional wisdom among real-estate professionals is that these well-to-do areas are in “wait-and-see” mode. This attitude, while comforting to the rich, is dangerously naïve.

Transparent, real-time sales data is carefully concealed from the buying public by the country’s real estate brokers; it tells a very different story. In these illiquid high-end markets, inventory is building, forced sales are on the rise, and prices are starting to head south.

And contrary to popular belief, value drops aren’t just taking place in far-off exurbs where palatial Toll Brothers (TOL) McMansions litter flattened hilltops. Established neighborhoods — many close to job centers with top schools – are seeing home prices fall for the first time in decades.

These high-priced markets, particularly because of the troubles in the jumbo loan market, have become dangerously illiquid. In many neighborhoods, just a handful of homes are currently listed for sale. If one seller gets antsy, loses his job or otherwise jumps at a low-ball offer, the entire market can gap down. The new, lower price sets the bar at which potential buyers begin their negotiations, putting sellers at the whims of their skittish neighbors.

Due to dramatic appreciation during the boom, many wealthy homeowners are sitting on huge equity cushions. While not something they often complain about, this could encourage quick sales, as sellers don’t need to hold out for the absolute highest price like their poorer, more levered neighbors on the other side of the tracks.

All this adds up to an increasingly bifurcated market. The most distressed areas are currently going through the final, violent throws of a real estate collapse for the ages. The process could still take months to run its course and some communities, sadly, may never recover.

Previously strong areas, on the other hand, are just now beginning to feel the pinch. Many, after decades of unfettered appreciation, have a very, very long way to fall.

By ANDREW JEFFERY

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

Foreclosure: It’s not just for those “subprime” people anymore.

Besieged by collapsing home prices and frightened banks scrounging for cash, even the real-estate industry’s brightest stars are finding there’s no place to hide. According to the New York Times, small and mid-size homebuilders who thrived during the housing boom are seeing credit lines pulled even before they miss a payment.

Banks like JPMorgan (JPM) and GMAC, the financing arm of General Motors (GM), loaned builders hundreds of billions of dollars — even as the housing market began to falter — to buy up vacant land. Now that demand for new homes has plunged (and buyers in some areas can pick up previously constructed homes for less than it costs to build a new one), builders’ ability to turn a profit has been effectively eliminated.

It’s estimated that over 20% of the nation’s homebuilders have closed their doors, even as big builders like D.R. Horton (DHI), Lennar (LEN) and Toll Brothers (TOL) limp along, bleeding cash and fighting for survival.

Lenders, for their part, are scrambling to mitigate risk.

Collateral, the term used to describe the assets against which loans are given out, protects lenders in the event of borrower default. As the value of collateral rises, banks become better protected since their loans are now backed up by a more valuable asset. In a downturn, however, falling collateral values means risk increases with each passing day.

In response, banks may ask borrowers to send in cash to make up for the lost value of their investment. These margin calls, as they’re known, can quickly force small firms into insolvency.

Such was the case for Brown Family Communities, a well-known builder in the Phoenix area. The Times reports the firm’s lender, JPMorgan, demanded millions in cash for land on the outskirts of town that had fallen in value. Brown balked, since he was yet to miss a payment and had been a longstanding client of the bank with an impeccable record. Ultimately, Brown lost the property and closed his doors, complaining “The real estate market is gone.”

Other builders have suffered a similar fate, proving that despite extensive government-led efforts to minimize losses from investments gone awry, the fundamental tenets of capitalism remain intact.

Bad investments should yield losses, period. Savvy new buyers, able to handle the risk inherent in buying distressed properties, can make bets that have the potential to reap huge rewards. This cycle of profits and losses fuels economic expansion. By forestalling losses, intervention delays recovery.

The speculative buying of vacant desert land on the edges of the Phoenix city limits in 2005 and 2006 certainly qualifies as a poor use of borrowed money. That builders are being asked for cash to cover banks’ potential losses should be seen as nothing more than prudent lending – something builders and other real-estate investors spent the boom years conveniently forgetting.

By ANDREW JEFFERY

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

Is it a buyer’s market?

Ask most real-estate professionals the above question, and the response will almost certainly be an emphatic “Yes!”

After all, they quickly explain, inventory levels are at all-time highs, sellers are desperate to get out from under their rapidly depreciating homes, and mortgage rates are at historic lows. What more could buyers ask for?

How about not losing their shirts, for starters.

The traditional definition of a buyer’s market is one where supply outstrips demand, pushing down prices: Buyers have the upper hand. As the bull market begins to wane, however, buyers lose their enthusiasm and become concerned about price. The market cools down and buyers shy away, forcing sellers to make concessions and lower prices. This, in turn, creates an environment where buyers can shop around, be picky, and patiently waiting for their dream house to come on the market.

As demand returns, sellers start upping their list prices, refusing to pay for closing costs and holding out for a better offer. Buyers, fearful they might miss out on the next boom, bid up asking prices and ask for fewer concessions. Now that sellers have the upper hand, the market favors sellers as prices move upward. Such is the cyclical nature of real estate.

This story has played out for decades as real estate plodded along, homebuilders like DR Horton (DHI), KB Homes (KBH) and Toll Brothers (TOL) supplied the market with new construction and home prices marched steadily upward, outpacing inflation by the narrowest of margins. A little more than 10 years ago, however, that relationship started to come unglued.

The recent housing bubble turned the prevailing view of real estate on its head. Homes, long viewed as the most stable of all assets, became a speculative tool for even the most unsophisticated investor. The mania, fueled by lax monetary policy and Wall Street alchemy, helped contributed to the financial crisis currently gripping our country. As property values have careened back to earth, real estate assets of all kinds have become toxic.

Nevertheless, the National Association of Realtors (or NAR) and its dedicated minions have tirelessly peddled their lies that ours is a buyer’s market. Let’s take a quick jaunt back in time to some recent headlines and where that traditional assessment of a buyer’s market got us:

Las Vegas: It’s Definitely a Buyer’s Market
USA Today: July 5, 2006
“Real estate looks like one of the biggest gambles in Las Vegas.”

How true. Property values in Vegas have fallen 33% since summer 2006. Not to be outdone by their peers at USA Today, ABC ran this piece just weeks later:

Take Advantage of Real Estate’s Buyer’s Market
ABC News: July 31, 2006

“The National Association of Realtors said that the number of homes for sale has reached new heights, which is good news for buyers. After years of a seller’s market, it’s finally a buyer’s paradise in Phoenix, AZ.”

Anyone who bought in that “buyer’s paradise” in Phoenix has seen their home’s value fall by more than 30%.

The point isn’t to criticize realtors for arguing it’s a buyer’s market: After all, one should expect nothing less from a group whose entire existence is based on convincing buyers it’s a great time to buy - irrespective of the truth. Just ask Gary Keller, whose new book, Shift: How Top Real Estate Agents Tackle Tough Times, advises agents to “find every way possible to overcome the media-driven real-estate malaise.”

The traditional definition of a buyer’s market needs a bit of a makeover. A more sensible definition is a market where buyers have ample opportunity to make good investments. To be sure, a home is more than just an investment; it’s a place to raise one’s family, to grow old, to spend time with loved ones. However, as far too many American families have learned in the past three years, homes can become a debilitating burden if bought at the wrong price.

In today’s market, there certainly exist attractive investment opportunities. But to label the market as a whole as one where buyers should be rushing out in search of the American Dream is borderline lunacy. Throughout much of the country, home prices are still too high: Real incomes don’t support prevailing property values, even after the historic declines we’ve already seen. Supply, despite remaining at record levels, is likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. Home prices are undergoing a much-needed correction, and will continue to do so until fundamental demand catches up with supply.

This isn’t to say every home on the market is overpriced, or that every buyer in the past 36 months has gotten a raw deal. There are deals to be had if one knows where and how to look - and, most importantly if the purchase makes good financial sense. To borrow a theme from Toddo, “financial staying power” should be at the forefront of any prospective buyer’s mind.

So ignore the hype, both good and bad. As often is the case, not until the most ardent bulls turn in their horns will the bears return to hibernation. So, as soon as realtors concede it may not be a buyer’s market after all, voila! A bottom we will have.

By ANDREW JEFFERY

For as bad as things are in the housing market, it’s remarkable that none of the country’s big homebuilders have gone bust. The industry’s resilience is a testament to how much money the firms raked in during the boom.

Just ask guys in charge.

The Wall Street Journal reports many homebuilder CEOs socked away such obscene amounts of cash over the past 5 years that they out-earned their Wall Street counterparts. As profits soared, Toll Brothers (TOL) CEO Robert Toll and his brother Bruce together took home $773 million, while Dwight Schar, chairman of Virginia-based NVR (NVR) earned more than $625 million from stock sales.

By contrast, vilified Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo earned a mere $471 million during the same period.

Sitting on huge — but dwindling — stockpiles of cash, big builders like DR Horton (DHI), Lennar (LEN) and Ryland Homes (RYL) have thus far ridden out the bloodletting. According to JPMorgan analyst Michael Rehaut, these 3 may yet see positive cash flow in 2009.

Their smaller rivals, however, may not be so lucky.

Rehaut predicts that Pulte Home (PHM) and KB Home (KBH) could see negative cash flow next year - and some analysts believe 2009 could finally be the year that weaker hands start to fold. Credit protection for Hovnanian (HOV), Standard Pacific (SPF) and Beazer Home (BZH) is trading like the companies’ failure is a foregone conclusion.

Meanwhile, one key characteristic of market bottoms is notably absent: Consolidation.

Just as strong American banks have swallowed up the weak, no meaningful housing market bottom will be found until homebuilders begin to feast on one another.

Let’s face it: We don’t need 10 different multi-billion dollar companies churning out indistinguishable cookie-cutter ”mansions” on tiny lots in cramped subdivisions miles from the nearest grocery store. We’ve got our hands full already, thank you very much.

Yesterday, the Commerce Department said October housing starts registered the lowest reading since 1959. Since just 4 of the 10 builders mentioned in this article existed 50 years ago, it looks like 6 are pretty much dispensable.

By ANDREW JEFFERY

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

Constrained supply, continuous demand and wealth beyond imagining: There’s a reason New York City real estate is the most expensive in the country.

Easy lending, a weak dollar and gobs of Wall Street money pushed already sky-high Manhattan property values into the stratosphere during the housing boom. Now, finally, after the rest of the country has succumbed to the housing crisis, the city that never sleeps could be facing a real-estate crash of its own.

According to Bloomberg, commercial real-estate transactions plummeted more than 60% this year; lending has dried up and buyers have backed off. Despite all the fundamental reasons for New York real estate to remain strong, it’s Pollyanna-ish to believe it will remain an island of calm in an economy deteriorating by the day - especially when the epicenter of the economic calamity can be found at the southern tip of the island.

Tuesday, Toll Brothers (TOL) CEO Robert Toll issued a dour outlook for Manhattan property prices: “Up [till now], New York City was a nice stand-alone, and a beacon, but it has now joined the ranks of the rest of the country… I would expect the financial business in New York to probably lose 100,000 people.”

Toll went on to explain that “The foreign market, which supported in large measure the pricier condos in New York City, is not there in force as it was… what with the euro going down in comparison to the dollar lately, and with their own economic crisis.”

And when New York City real estate goes, it goes big.

The last housing slump in Manhattan began in at the end of 1987 and lasted for nearly 10 years. During that time, according to data compiled by quadlet.com, prices fell 40%. Adjusted for inflation, they tumbled almost 60%.

The New York Metro area is poised for a similar fall. According to the S&P Case/Shiller Home Price Index, home prices have slipped just 6.9% in the last year, compared with 26.7% in the Los Angeles area, 27.3% in San Francisco, and 9.8% in Chicago.

As the housing slump spreads into previously strong markets, these pockets of strength are starting to crack.

The longer credit markets remain under duress — and when firms like Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS) and Citigroup (C) are laying off ever more employees in their ongoing cost-cutting efforts – the deeper the slump is likely to be. A strengthening dollar and floundering economies around the world will continue to keep foreign buyers away.

What goes up, must come down.

This post first appeared on Minyanville.

I came upon an interesting report out from Deutsche Bank on the effect high gas prices are having on home prices. Below are some highlights:

• Gas prices are up 167% in the last five years, 32% in the last year.
• Monthly gas expenditure is up to $519 in June ‘08 from $173 in June ‘02.
• $54,000 in home price purchasing power has been lost in the last five years; $22,000 in the last year alone (Inland Empire, CA is the worst at 46% lost in the last five years).
• As measured by increased monthly expenses and translated into mortgage payment terms, the impact of rising gas prices is equivalent to a 2.47% increase in mortgage rates over the last five years; 0.98% in the last year (Inland Empire is again the worst at a 4.35% effective increase over five years).
• Deutsche sees non-bubble areas like Texas and the South more exposed to gas price increases than bubble states, due to long commute distances and low relative home prices.
• Homebuilders are being negatively effected by this trend, particularly in developments far away from the city center.
• Builders will likely switch strategies and focus on urban “infill” and closer-in townhome projects.
• According to Deutsche, Meritage Homes (MTH), Ryland (RYL) and Lennar (LEN) have the most exposure to highly impacted areas; MDC Holdings (MDC), NVR (NVR) and Toll Brothers (TOL) have the lowest exposure.