This post first appeared on Minyanville.

The Obama administration is busy touting the burgeoning success of its mortgage modification program. Unfortunately, it’s a farce: Out of one side of his mouth, the President touts a dedication to the besieged middle class, while from the other, lauds a loan modification program which steals money from struggling homeowners in favor of banks — already the recipients of billions in taxpayer-funded bailouts.

The ploy would be amusingly hypocritical if it weren’t so sad.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the Treasury Department claims that the Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, has begun more than 650,000 so-called “trial modifications” since its inception this February. The commonplace explanation for the latest in a host of failed mortgage modification schemes is that it’s a natural first step to getting struggling borrowers back on the regular monthly payment track.

HAMP mandates that in order to qualify for a permanent loan modification, borrowers must first complete a trial period of three months with lower payments, in addition to submitting the proper documentation required for a more permanent solution. On the surface, this seems logical, even fair: Only after a show of good faith should homeowners be allowed a second chance.

Lenders like Wells Fargo (WFC), Bank of America (BAC), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), and Citibank (C), however, are required to show no similar evidence of good faith.

And I’ve yet to read a news story that accurately describes how this program works: Even as banks ask borrowers to cough up monthly payments on a house that’s likely to be hopelessly underwater, the foreclosure process continues.

Notices of default turn into notices of trustee sale, which turn into trustee sales, which turn into repossessions and eventually evictions. Meanwhile, as the homeowner is given a false sense of security that scraping together payments each month could save his house, lenders are under no obligation to grant a stay of foreclosure.

In other words, banks determined to take a loan through the foreclosure process can easily — and with Washington’s blessing — grant a trial modification which allows them to pinch a final three months of payments from homeowners already on the verge of financial insolvency, while offering nothing more than an empty promise in return.

To be sure, many of these homeowners got themselves in over their heads by overextending their debt load on an overpriced home. Foreclosure, in some cases, is a reasonable solution.

But an initiative touted as a long-awaited success in the battle against foreclosures is in fact just another way for Washington to redirect money from the pockets of ordinary Americans — however economically downtrodden — to big banks surviving solely by suckling the government teat.

By RYAN TAYLOR

Just when you thought the market for new homes couldn’t get any worse, it did.

The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo January builder sentiment index dropped to 8 from 9. While the homebuilders were setting records for new home sales in 2005 and 2006, they’re now setting records for the lowest confidence on record, as 8 breaks last month’s record low of 9.

The homebuilders are very clear on what needs to happen to bring back their confidence and revive the market for new homes (Hint: It has nothing to do with building homes that people want to live in for the right price.)

“Conditions in the nation’s housing market aren’t getting any better, and they aren’t going to get any better until the federal government takes substantial action to encourage qualified buyers to get back in the market.” NAHB Chairman Sandy Dunn said.

One of the biggest reasons we are in this housing crisis is that builders put millions of buyers in homes they couldn’t afford. Through questionable relationships and kickbacks, builders partnered with lenders to encourage buyers to stretch beyond their means. This common practice during the boom created a massive over-supply of homes which has yet to be worked through.

As a result, homebuilders are left with basically two choices – 1) offer homes at prices that are reflective of the current market conditions or 2) do not sell any homes and plead for Uncle Sam to help them.

Needless to say, they’re not going for option number one because it will put most of them out of business. Furthermore, the NAHB seems delusional on why people are not buying their homes.

“Qualified buyers are clearly in the wings but they’re looking for a significant signal from the federal government that now is the time to return to the market” NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe said.

This statement makes the assumption that qualified buyers are not in the new home market because the government needs to give them some kind of divine signal to know when to buy. As an alternative explanation, I think qualified buyers are not buying new homes because they’re far away from job centers, listed above market and were built by companies that frequently stop work on projects halfway through– existing residents be damned.

Until one of the major publicly traded home builders goes out of business, we are not near the bottom in the housing cycle.